CPA PEP Prep Q&A

Quiz 4, Financial Reporting Q#14, Typo?

 
Picture of Marina Morozova
Quiz 4, Financial Reporting Q#14, Typo?
by Marina Morozova Send a message - 3 Apr 2017, 1:05 AM
 

Hello.

Please verify the solution to this question.

As per solution we should subtract a residual value of $50000. Should it be $150000?

Thank you,

Marina

Taylor Inc. leased a cutting and stuffing machine for its furniture manufacturing plant effective April 1, 2014. The lease qualifies as a finance lease and the asset has been set up on Taylor's balance sheet at the value of $540,000. The term of the lease is 5 years and at the end of the lease the machine will have a fair value of $150,000. The machine is expected to be useful for 6 years. The lease allows Taylor to purchase the machine at the end of the lease for $100,000. For machines used in manufacturing, Taylor uses straight-line depreciation. Under IFRS, how much depreciation should Taylor record for their year-ended December 31, 2014 for the machine?

Your answer is incorrect.

Per IAS 17.27, Leases, the depreciation policy for leased assets should be consistent with that for owned assets. Therefore, the straight-line depreciation method is acceptable. IAS 17.28 states that if there is reasonable certainty that the lessee will obtain ownership by the end of the lease term, the period of expected use is the useful life of the asset. Therefore, since there is a BPO because the purchase amount is less than the fair value at the end of the lease, there is reasonable certainty that Taylor will purchase the asset and therefore, the useful life should be used. As there is a residual value, this must be deducted from the carrying value before calculating depreciation as per IAS 16.53, Property, Plant and Equipment. Therefore, the depreciation charge for the year-ended December 31, 2014 would be calculated as ($540,000 - $50,000)/6 years x 9/12 (number of months remaining in year) = $61,250. Answer (1) is incorrect as it uses the lease term rather than the useful life and assumes the fair value at the end of the lease term to be its residual value. ($540,000 - $150,000)/5 years x 9/12 = $58,500. Answer (3) is incorrect as it does not include the residual value. $540,000/6 years x 9/12 = $67,500. Answer (4) is incorrect as it uses the lease term rather than the useful life and no residual value. $540,000/5 years x 9/12 = $81,000.


The correct answer is: 61250


Picture of Lawrence Tan
Re: Quiz 4, Financial Reporting Q#14, Typo?
by Lawrence Tan Send a message - 3 Apr 2017, 11:43 AM
 

Hi Marina,

The residual value is the fair market value at the end of the estimated useful life which is 6 years not at the end of the lease term. However, nothing in the question tells us that the residual value is $50,000.  I was hinting that the residual value was calculated based on subtracting the bargain purchase option from the fair value of the leased asset at the end of the lease term but I am not sure what it the reasoning for it. Maybe somebody else has an explanation.

Lawrence

Picture of Amrit Pal Singh
Re: Quiz 4, Financial Reporting Q#14, Typo?
by Amrit Pal Singh Send a message - 10 Apr 2017, 4:27 PM
 

Residual value is value which Taylor will be able to get after its useful life. The question on silent on what would be its residual life after 6 years. But after 5 years its residual value would definitely be $50000 as that is amount that Taylor would get on selling the machine (For getting $150000 it would have to spend $100000). So net effect will $50000 which is the residual value after 5 years.

Picture of Marina Morozova
Re: Quiz 4, Financial Reporting Q#14, Typo?
by Marina Morozova Send a message - 10 Apr 2017, 9:50 PM
 

Hello,

I am still struggling to see the reasoning... It makes sense to consider 50000 as the residual value at the end of 5th year, as a difference between FMV and bargaining price. But, we use the calculation for 6 years, not for 5. Why would not this number (50K) change after one more year? I am lost...  Can anyone refer me to the quote from a standard, if something like this residual value has been explained there?

Regards,